> connection is explained along with the giving of the name. > name and some memorable property of the temperament, and (b) this > where (a) there is a connection, albeit a cryptic one, between the
> from being _a_ name as opposed to no name, except in those few > but they are of very little help to the person trying to break into > Sure these names are fun (mostly for those who get to make them > better than the cryptic (or even meaningless) names that I also > commas and temperaments, but I really don't think eponyms are much > I know you all think I'm a spoilsport with regard to the naming of The names I've hung on some important temperaments over Paul's cutoff. Would nevertheless be a good time to bring up is what people think of While we are on the subject of names, a less urgent question which now Subject: Names for important high-complexity temperaments Message: 11104 - Contents - Hide Contents
Someone had better ask him if he'd allow it first if Paul likes it I think "keenan" makes sense, though admittedly it isn'tĪs cute a name as armadillo. Thanks for this! I've been promoting "hanson" as the new name forĬatakleismic. > 11 note chain-of-minor-thirds scale * (Wayb.) implies > mapping of, while on the other hand Dave Keenan's page at > calling 7-limit kleismic, paper implies a "catakleismic" 7-limit mapping, 37]]: see - Type Ok * (Wayb.), fig. If 5-limit kleismic is "hanson", what about "keenan" for what we've
0 kommentar(er)
